Thomas Cochrane and Roger Bateman
Unitec New Zealand
Australasian Journal of Educational Technology
2010, 26(1), 1-14
Built on the foundation of four years of research and implementation of mobile
learning projects (m-learning), this paper provides an overview of the potential of the
integration of mobile Web 2.0 tools (based around smartphones) to facilitate social
constructivist pedagogies and engage students in tertiary education. Pedagogical
affordances of mobile Web 2.0 tools are evaluated, and student usage and feedback is
outlined via an interactive multimedia timeline (using YouTube videos) illustrating
how these mobile Web 2.0 pedagogical affordances have transformed pedagogy and
facilitated student engagement in a variety of course contexts. A rubric for evaluating
appropriate smartphone choices is provided, and a model for implementing mobile
Web 2.0 pedagogical integration is presented.
Evaluation criteria
|
Notes
|
What type of article is it?
|
Content:
|
What is the main
issue/problem being discussed?
|
Content:
|
Skim read – what could your
dissertation gain by including this article?
|
Content:
|
What is the article’s
contribution to knowledge?
|
Content:
|
How can this information be
integrated into your review?
|
Content:
|
Compare and contrast to
similar articles – for or against/ or an extension of the literature?
|
Content:
|
Are there recommendations
for further research?
|
Content:
|
Where is the article placed
in your field? Famous author?
|
Evaluation:
|
Is the article well
written, interesting and easy to read?
|
Evaluation:
|
Is there a clear research
question – can it be tested?
|
Evaluation of Hypothesis:
|
What methods are used to
carry out research
|
Evaluation of the Research
Design:
|
Is the design appropriate
for testing the stated hypothesis?
|
Evaluation of the Research
Design:
|
What are the limitations of
the design/research methods?
|
Evaluation of the Research
Design:
|
Are there aspects of the
design that could be applied to your work?
|
Evaluation of the Research
Design:
|
Are the results well
displayed and clear?
|
Evaluation of Data
Presentation:
|
Are the results in keeping
with the design?
|
Evaluation of the Research
Results:
|
Are the implications of the
study clear?
|
Evaluation of the Research
Results:
|
Have the results been
appropriately discussed?
|
Evaluation of further calls
for research:
|